RSS .92| RSS 2.0| ATOM 0.3
  • Home
  •  

    A brief liveblog of trade deadline coverage (I want to die)

    April 3rd, 2013

    Hi! I’m writing these posts to benefit 826 Boston, a nonprofit writing and tutoring center for area kids at which I volunteer. If you want to make a donation, you can click right here. Thanks!

    I figured by now that I would be able to write a quick little blog about whatever trade had happened by noon or so, and get the hell outta here for the day and just check my phone a bunch. As you know by now, no dice.

    As of 12:19 p.m. Eastern, there have been no trades. Not one. Not a single friggin’ trade. There’s nothing to analyze. Not that it’s stopped TSN from analyzing what might happen, because TSN is the worst.

    There was a thing James Duthie said earlier in the day about how the average first trade in the last few years takes place around 10:25 a.m. or so. This did nothing to prevent his show from starting at 8 a.m., and they mostly talked about nothing for the two and a half hours before most even anticipated anything happening. Which tells you everything you need to know about this kind of crap coverage.

    So here’s what I’m going to do: I’m just going to write what happens on TSN until I want to kill myself, then I’m going to stop. Here goes nothing.

    They’re talking about the Canucks. And that means they’re talking about Roberto Luongo. Did you know he’s on the block? James Duthie just said Mike Gillis has been one of the “more busier” GMs on deadline day, so now there is an in-depth discussion of how he hasn’t called anyone and no one has really called him today. Farhan Lalji with the big scoop that Luongo is in the building for practice, because, you know, the team scheduled practice.

    “We have a trade, and… kind of,” Gord Miller intones with something resembling enthusiasm for reasons I think I’ll never understand. It’s a minor-league deal: Max Sauve from Boston to Chicago for Rob Flick. If you’ve heard of them, get a life. “I don’t know that it’s worth analyzing,” Duthie says. He’s right. On Twitter, though, Darren Dreger gave this one four exclamation points.

    More Canucks talk. Forward depth is an issue, they say, because everyone’s injured. Booth, Kesler, that guy I forget already. And now they’re talking about the Zack Kassian trade and how successful it wasn’t. Oh god it’s Pierre McGuire. This might be a very short post. After he talks about the Canucks’ power play issues, talk circles back to Luongo. He has a “gargantuan contract.” Good analysis here. Will there be a compliance buyout? Oh man this is rough.

    Now they’re going to Ryane Clowe on the phone. He’s got nothinge to saye. Duthie asks if it’s hard to go to a team “you’ve been trained to hate” which is just about the dumbest thing I’ve ever heard. Clowe isn’t sure why he doesn’t have more than no goals this season. “That happens sometimes,” he says. I mean I guess so, dude.

    They go to commercial just as my desire to blow my brains out reaches its apex, but not before playing some hideous song on the way out. I’m not doing this any more.

    But here’s the thing, right? This is literally all this show has been for four and a half hours at this point. I think TSN should mail checks to everyone (like me) dumb enough to watch this for so long. I have so much more I could have been doing with my life than seeing someone cut to Mike Milbury and Keith Jones like their opinions on who should go where, or anything really, are worth literally even hearing at this point. How do you get Milbury on TV during trade deadline day and not at least make fun of him for the Yashin thing. Like, that’s gotta be your logical bare minimum, right? Further proof that this show should be nuked from orbit.

    Don’t forget to donate to 826 Boston. Thanks again.


    Why Flyers fans are the absolute best

    March 23rd, 2013

    (Ed. note: This is a sponsored post for Matt. If you want me to write about any old thing in hockey, all you have to do is donate $50 below. It’s easy and fun. Bye.)

    Hi! I’m writing these posts to benefit 826 Boston, a nonprofit writing and tutoring center for area kids at which I volunteer. If you want to make a donation, you can click right here. Thanks!

    One subject you hear brought up a lot in sports, for some terrible reason, is that such-and-such a team has the best fans or is the Mecca of hockey, or other such nonsense that matters approximately zero percent. It’s all pointless, specifically because the fans of the Philadelphia Flyers are clearly the greatest, and it’s not even close.

    If you are a fan of, say, the Red Wings, or the Penguins, or the Canadiens, or even the Lightning, you might have a bit of a beef with this, but in reality you are dumb and wrong about it. Consider this: Would you still be a fan of a team that is this bad despite having a bunch of reasons not to be?

    The Flyers spend money, which is good for fans, but they do it in a maddening and embarrassing way — the Ilya Bryzgalov contract, the Scott Hartnell extension, the Kimmo Timonen deal, etc. — which is bad for fans.

    The Flyers routinely draft exciting young talent that are able to be incorporated into the NHL lineup, which is good for fans, but they then trade them away for seemingly no reason whatsoever — Jeff Carter, Mike Richards, James van Riemsdyk, etc. — which is bad for fans.

    They routinely make the playoffs due to their traditional regular-season dominance of most of the Eastern Conference, which is good for fans, but then get crushed by vastly superior teams with actual defense and goaltending — the Devils, the Bruins, the Blackhawks, the Penguins, etc. — which is bad for fans.

    They have many players on the roster who would do anything to win, which is good for fans, but a number of them are also extremely dirty and play only in an effort to hurt people, then get suspended — Zac Rinaldo, Harry Zolniercyzk, Tom Sestito, etc. — which is bad for fans.

    They have an owner who wants to win at all costs, which is good for fans, but in doing so he routinely meddles in the affairs of the men he pays a lot of money to operate the team, and in doing so generally just messes everything up — acquiring Ilya Bryzgalov, making a run at Shea Weber, etc. — which is bad for fans.

    They also never give up on their goals of being the best in the league, which is good for fans, but end up falling short in the most hilarious ways possible — the Patrick Kane overtime game-winner, the defense completely melting down last season, getting swept by the Bruins, etc. — which is bad for fans.

    It’s not easy, is what I’m saying. But despite all that, no one else in the NHL cares enough about their dumb teams to slash the tires of any car in the parking lot with Quebec plates or beat a Rangers fan half to death. Except Flyers fans. They are truly the greatest.

    Don’t forget to donate to 826 Boston. Thanks again.


    “I can’t believe the Bruins tried to fight us”

    March 17th, 2013

    Hi! I’m writing these posts to benefit 826 Boston, a nonprofit writing and tutoring center for area kids at which I volunteer. If you want to make a donation, you can click right here. Thanks!

    Yesterday’s Bruins/Capitals game was a very interesting contest for a couple reasons. First, it was a chance to the Caps to prove they are at least a half-decent team (they aren’t), but moreover it was perhaps the first in a long line of impressive wins by Boston, which is for my money the best team in the East on paper.

    The Bruins physically intimidated, beat up, and most importantly crumpled the Caps up like tissue paper en route to a dominant 4-1 win, and Washington didn’t like it one little bit.

    I don’t know what they thought they might see when they went into TD Garden, but the sight of a team with the third-most fighting majors in the league this season, with four guys who have engaged in three or more scraps, should have been enough for the Caps to say to themselves, “Well, we have approximately no actual fighters in the lineup, so maybe we just try to stick to our game so we don’t get the absolute Christ beat out of us.” It didn’t happen that way, which should have come as a surprise to no one considering the Bruins just lost to this same not-good team in overtime not that long ago.

    The festivities really and truly began when Alex Ovechkin crosschecked Brad Marchand in a way that one of the dirtiest players in the NHL didn’t particularly care for. Obviously, Ovechkin wasn’t about to drop the gloves with anyone for any reason, so Marchand went around looking for someone else to oblige him. Mike Ribeiro stepped up to the plate for reasons I still don’t remotely understand (it was his first career fight) and got fed a number of decent shots.

    Then Matt Hendricks and Nathan Horton fought when the former more or less jumped the latter off a draw, and Horton left the ice bleeding. Boston didn’t like that, so a little later on, Shawn Thornton tried to get Hendricks to answer, and the Capitals’ one actual kind-of fighter wisely demurred. But when Adam McQuaid got involved, he took that opportunity instead and got pounded for his efforts. Boston ended up winning 4-1, because of course they did, and the Caps weren’t feeling too good about any of it after the game.

    There was a lot of talk about what a “joke” it all was, and how the Caps shouldn’t have allowed themselves to stoop to Boston’s level in this way. I don’t know about the joke part; you don’t go into Boston and expect a gentlemanly game free of checking, especially if you’re going to throw around crosschecks like Ovechkin did, and you sure don’t jump one of the team’s better goalscorers in an effort to swing some momentum back your team’s way. What did they expect to happen? Thornton wasn’t about to challenge him to pistols at dawn; don’t walk down that side of the street if you don’t want to get pulled into a dark alley and mugged.

    Even after this, the Caps kind of acted like babies, with both Ribeiro and Hendricks getting into it verbally with fans who taunted them, and I guess that kind of underscores just how frustrating yesterday was for a team everyone thought would be much better than it is.

    But this is what the Bruins do. This is what they’ve done for years. You kind of can’t be shocked when one of them tries to hit your teammate in the face at this point. You really can’t be mad about it. But I guess when you’re 14th in the East, you have a lot to be mad about in general.

    Don’t forget to donate to 826 Boston. Thanks again.


    When did we start caring about fans chanting?

    March 15th, 2013

    Hi! I’m writing these posts to benefit 826 Boston, a nonprofit writing and tutoring center for area kids at which I volunteer. If you want to make a donation, you can click right here. Thanks!

    One of my most indelible memories of going to an NHL game involved a meeting of the Mighty Ducks of Anaheim and Boston Bruins midweek right after the FleetCenter (now TD Garden) opened. I was probably 12 or so. As often happens when you sit in the cheap seats, there was a group of drunk college kids at this game, which wasn’t particularly well-attended as far as I recall.

    And the entire game, all those kids did was ride Teemu Selanne’s ass every time he took a shift, calling his name in a collective sing-song voice. This was, for some reason, wildly hilarious to me. The obvious sacrilege of taunting a legend of the sport and perhaps the world’s greatest-ever human aside, it was the first time I’d heard a group of people really, collectively be a bunch of dicks to someone at an NHL game. (I’d been going to college games for a few years, of course, and chants there are often about as mean-spirited and constant as they can get, but I’d not actually heard this kind of active dislike expressed at a Bruins game before.) Again, though, I was 12.

    With all that having been said, though, it occurred to me in later years that simply chanting a person’s name at him over and over is a) Not that interesting, and b) perfected with the “Daaaaaryl!” chants of the 1980s. Somehow, though, in the last few years the things fans chant in unison at people has become news in the hockey world.

    One supposes you can trace it all back to the fact that Winnipeg stole a team from Atlanta, more or less under cover of night, and the immediate praise that fan base drew from commentators for being the best in the league because they’re loud (due to playing in a matchbox-sized building) and, well, clever’s not the right word. They chanted “Crosby’s better!” at Alex Ovechkin that one time —statement of fact apparently counts as wit these days — and “Silver medal!” at Ryan Miller — while being able to count the number of Canadian Olympians on their roster with zero fingers.

    The height of Swiftian incisiveness this was not (especially since these events came after Rangers fans famously chanted “Can you hear us?” at Bruce Boudreau, who had previously claimed not to be impressed with the noise made by the crowd at MSG, months earlier), but all the praise has served to encourage the least-tolerable fans in the league to continue being obnoxious in the least-interesting way possible. With the Rangers losing to the Jets on the road, Winnipeggers chanted “Tortorella!” at John Tortorella, for reasons that are not entirely clear.

    The sooner everyone stops caring about crap like this the better off we’ll all be. What is the cut-off for such a chant being noteworthy. “Go ______ go!” is clearly not drawing any attention, nor is chanting an opposing goalie’s name. No one even cares when Habs fans do the “boo every time Zdeno Chara touches the puck” act. But somehow, chanting Tortorella’s last name is enough for some slackjawed Winnipeg media member — who you know was just raring to get the question in —to ask the beleaguered coach about it, and you know if any other crowd did the same to Claude Noel the admonishments from the pom-pom waving newspaper sweathogs from that city would come hard and decisive.

    I guess this is all my long way of saying that I hope if we ignore Jets fans long enough they’ll all just shut up and realize their team is awful. If no one outside Manitoba cares about the Jets, why should anyone care about their fans?

    Don’t forget to donate to 826 Boston. Thanks again.


    Ah yes, Matt Kassian will fill that void the Senators have

    March 13th, 2013

    (Ed. note: This is a sponsored post for Jo Innes. If you want me to write about any old thing in hockey, all you have to do is donate $50 below. It’s easy and fun. Bye.)

    Hi! I’m writing these posts to benefit 826 Boston, a nonprofit writing and tutoring center for area kids at which I volunteer. If you want to make a donation, you can click right here. Thanks!

    If there’s one thing the Senators need in their attempts to make the Stanley Cup Playoffs for the second year in a row, it’s… well obviously it’s for Erik Karlsson’s achilles to reassemble itself 100 percent and be ready to play tomorrow.

    But if there’s two things the Senators need it’s… okay well I mean there’s Jason Spezza getting healthy too, but that’s going to come relatively soon, I’m pretty sure. But if there’s three things the Senators need, well, I could do this all day. The fact of the matter is that one thing the Senators definitely did not need is to acquire Matt Kassian from the Minnesota Wild for a 2014 sixth-round pick yesterday.

    Here’s a real quote from general manager Bryan Murray on why the Senators went out and acquired a player who has nine games under his belt this season, all of them at the AHL level:

    “He’s a big strong guy, he’s a very physical player, he’s a very willing combatant. With the number of young players and injuries we have on our roster, there has got to be a sense of comfort that they can go out and play without being pushed around, which has happened a couple times here so we just felt it was a need and an addition that, given the opportunity to get one, a guy like this, a big guy, he’s a young player and we’re hoping that he’ll work with our coaches and be a real contributor to our team.”

    That’s an awful lot of words to say, “The other teams in the Northeast have some fighters and we don’t,” but that’s the general thrust of it. At 6-foot-4 and 232 pounds, Kassian is a big boy. He also sucks at hockey. And so the Senators’ decision to use him in the lineup (albeit “at the coach’s discretion,” according to Murray) seems like it would be not at all conducive to winning.

    It’s true that the Senators didn’t have a true fighter in the lineup. Hit-and-run pukes like Chris Neil don’t count, because he at least has some amount of value to the team outside punching guys in the face. This reeks of remorse for letting Zenon Konopka walk, coincidentally to the Wild, and even then, at least Konopka wins draws pretty effectively. The list of hockey things outside of fighting that Kassian does pretty effectively begins and probably ends with skating without falling down most of the time.

    It seemed to me that the Senators were a just-okay hockey team last year, but one that wisely stepped out of the Northeast Arms Race that saw Montreal and Buffalo bulk up in order to better physically compete with the Bruins and Leafs. Somehow, their currently being fifth in the East despite being not-that-great and then suffering all those catastrophic injuries on top of it isn’t enough for Murray, and he has to try to make Paul MacLean waste a roster spot to put this bum into the lineup five minutes a night.

    I’ll remind you again that Kassian only has nine games this season in the AHL. Obviously losing a sixth-round pick next year is almost the NHL equivalent of giving up nothing, but even that’s too much. The only thing I can think is maybe Murray thought he was getting a steal by acquiring Zack Kassian from the wrong team.

    Don’t forget to donate to 826 Boston. Thanks again.


    Geno’s Ordination Song: The NHL’s best rivalry

    March 7th, 2013

    (Ed. note: This is a sponsored post for Sarah Barnett (Happy birthday!). If you want me to write about any old thing in hockey, all you have to do is donate $50 below. It’s easy and fun. Bye.)

    Hi! I’m writing these posts to benefit 826 Boston, a nonprofit writing and tutoring center for area kids at which I volunteer. If you want to make a donation, you can click right here. Thanks!

    In the NHL today there are many famous rivalries. Bruins and Canadiens always gets interesting because of how much those two teams seem to legitimately hate and want to seriously injure each other. Blackhawks and Red Wings will always have a place in the hearts of Original Six fans and those who currently like seeing Chicago beat up their ancient rival. The Battles of Ontario and Alberta have a certain colloquial charm even if those four teams have generally been unwatchable in the last several years.

    But I think that the hockey world at large has largely seized on the somehow-still-burgeoning Battle of Pennsylvania between Pittsburgh and Philadelphia and said that yes this is definitively the best rivalry in the league. Any arguments to the contrary seem rather silly.

    Let’s put it this way: That insane series the two played last year, which only went six games but somehow contained 56 goals — a number I had to look up and then quadruple check because it doesn’t seem like it could be in any way correct — and featured suspensions and controversy and guys in bear suits and all that acrimony, was only in the first round. Hell, the Senators played in the first round. Who cares about the first round? Imagine if there was actually a lot on the line besides getting some tee times squared away before the beginning of May. If this series had been, say, the Eastern Conference Final instead of one of eight first-round matchups, someone might actually have died. I mean that. Zac Rinaldo or someone would have pulled a knife out of his sock and stabbed someone on a defensive zone faceoff.

    This series, and this rivalry, takes on such import that it led Peter Laviolette, who when he isn’t blindly defending the borderline criminal acts of his team’s dirtiest players seems like a fairly rational fellow, to proclaim that after a single series in which he had 6-8-14 against the Penguins’ defense that Claude Giroux was the best player in the world, usurping the crown held by Sidney Crosby, who himself had a paltry 3-5-8 in the same stretch. Much was made of this proclamation, which a short time later was brushed under the rather lumpy-looking rug under which all embarrassing things related to embarrassingly wrong statements from members of the Flyers organization are banished once Giroux went 2-1-3 in a four-game sweep by New Jersey in the next round.

    And now these two teams face each other once again tonight in a game that probably won’t feature between 10 and 13 goals, but then again it looks like Marc-Andre Fleury and Ilya Bryzgalov get the go tonight, so I also wouldn’t want to totally rule out that exact thing happening. Giroux, after a dreadful start, has 19 points in his last 16 games, and Jake Voracek has a team-leading 27 in 24. Meanwhile, Crosby leads the league with 36 points in 23 games (no fair) and Evgeni Malkin is on 23 points in just 19 games. James Neal is at 22 in 23, including 14 goals, and somehow Chris Kunitz has 12-16-28 in 23 as well.

    These are teams that can score, and do it a lot. And they can also beat each other up. After a kind of disappointing opening game of the season, their last matchup, on Feb. 20, featured 11 goals and 48 penalty minutes. So, you know, something entertaining is probably going to happen.

    Don’t forget to donate to 826 Boston. Thanks again.


    Patrice Bergeron is really great

    March 4th, 2013

    (Ed. note: This is a sponsored post for Corey Blauss (again!). If you want me to write about any old thing in hockey, all you have to do is donate $50 below. It’s easy and fun. Bye.)

    Hi! I’m writing these posts to benefit 826 Boston, a nonprofit writing and tutoring center for area kids at which I volunteer. If you want to make a donation, you can click right here. Thanks!

    No. 1 centers are very hard to come by in the NHL, and have been for rather a long time. While there are 30 guys currently filling the role of No. 1 center on NHL teams, probably only about half the teams in the league actually have one, and a few of them have two (Pittsburgh certainly among them).

    One team that is rather fortunate to have a No. 1 center is also one that probably doesn’t get enough credit for doing so. The Boston Bruins’ top-line pivot is Patrice Bergeron, and if he’s not one of the top centers on the planet I’ll just about eat my damn hat. The interesting thing about Bergeron, and why he’s often not involved in such discussions the way Stamkos and Crosby and Malkin and Toews are is that Bergeron never puts up the numbers his counterparts do. He only has 5-13-18 in 19 games this season (including 1-2-3 in tonight’s loss to Montreal). That obviously isn’t a ton, but it’s more or less in line with what he’s done over the course of his career. The fact that his career best was 73 points in 81 games in 2005-06, when he was just 20 years old, is in some ways disappointing. But since that time, he’s also developed into perhaps the premier two-way center in the league.

    Let’s put it another way: There are a lot of centers Canada can take to the Olympics every four years. Last time out, Bergeron happened to be one of them. Filling the nets isn’t his modus operandi; the most goals he’s ever scored in a season was 31, and that, too, was in 2005-06. But he’s so good that arguably the best hockey team ever assembled by an entity aside from USA hockey brought him on board nonetheless.

    And then there’s obviously the faceoffs. Bergeron is currently fourth in the league at winning them. The year before, he was second. And prior to that, he was tied for eighth and fifth. You have to go all the way back to 2008-09 to find the last time Bergeron wasn’t top-10 in the league at the dot, and even then, he was only 12th at 54.5 percent. That, too, helps Claude Julien to trust him everywhere.

    There’s not a more do-everything-right center in the league than Bergeron, who gets minutes in all situations against top competition in all three zones. He’s just so reliable, quietly excellent, and clean. He rarely gets sent off for committing penalties, with only 168 PIM in nine seasons. And that doesn’t mean he’s not a physical player, because as evidenced by last night’s game, he’s more than willing to take the body and play along the boards, even after suffering two concussions in the middle part of his career. Physical play without incurring too many penalties — never more than 28 in a season! — indicates clean, smart play. And having a player with this level of skill on the ice and never putting his team down a man is incredibly valuable.

    While there are a few teams that wouldn’t swap their top-line centers straight-up for Bergeron, the vast majority would do so in a heartbeat and walk away laughing at Bruins GM Peter Chiarelli for his having been so dumb. Not every day you say that about someone who topped out at something like 22 goals 64 points over the last seven seasons.

    Don’t forget to donate to 826 Boston. Thanks again.


    In vague defense of homer broadcasters I guess

    March 2nd, 2013

    (Ed. note: This is a sponsored post for Felipe. If you want me to write about any old thing in hockey, all you have to do is donate $50 below. It’s easy and fun. Bye.)

    Hi! I’m writing these posts to benefit 826 Boston, a nonprofit writing and tutoring center for area kids at which I volunteer. If you want to make a donation, you can click right here. Thanks!

    One thing that seems to really bother lots of hockey fans is when opposing teams have announcers that are incredibly over the top homers for the teams they cover. I myself am guilty of considering the Detroit announce crew, for example, to be completely embarrassing, and perhaps most famously consider the Penguins guys the worst in the league by a pretty considerable margin.

    But now I’m starting to wonder why this is. Perhaps the most famous example of guys who are universally despised by fans across the league is Boston’s Jack Edwards, who is by his own admission a gigantic Bruins homer. On a recent broadcast, he brought this fact up himself, and added, “So what?” And I guess at the end of the day that’s a pretty good question.

    It wasn’t until the advent of Center Ice and GameCenter Live that we even ever got to actually hear other announcers at all, unless we were unfortunate enough to have to travel to Pittsburgh or Detroit to begin with. But when the technology allowed us to watch hockey at all hours of the day and night, these guys were foisted upon other teams’ fans, and were immediately found distasteful. But the fact of the matter is that just because a guy is clearly partisan in favor of some team you don’t care about that doesn’t determine whether he’s actually good at his job. Edwards may be a homer, but if you can slog past that — admittedly not easy — he actually calls a pretty damn good hockey game; he’s prepared, he’s not entirely unwilling to give the other team credit (unless it’s Philadelphia or Montreal), he brings a decent amount of excitement to his broadcasts. Does he occasionally, say, cackle when Randy Jones gets run from behind? Or jump up and down with glee at a crazy Bruins comeback while Andy Brickley stands back in abject horror? Sure he does. I’ve met Jack Edwards on a few occasions, too, and I can assure you that his “act” is anything but. He legitimately loves the Bruins, and if he were calling games for your team, you’d love him for his enthusiasm.

    But again, Edwards is at least good at his job. He could call games on NBC Sports Network between two non-Bruins teams and you likely wouldn’t miss Doc Emrick at all. I’ve heard Edwards and Brickley call college hockey games and they’re great broadcasts because those guys are great broadcasters, Bruins homers though they may be. On the other hand, it’s difficult to imagine a guy like Paul Steigerwald or John Shorthouse (Vancouver) or John Ahlers (Anaheim) doing the same. Those guys are all homers to varying extents, but they also aren’t good at calling hockey games.

    The only reason people hate Edwards, I think, is that they don’t like or at least don’t care about the Bruins, and all he does is rain sunshine and kisses on them at every turn. It’s easy to see where that would grate, obviously. But where Edwards differs from, say, Ken Daniels is that he calls the hockey game, and that’s ultimately his job. He describes the play well — Jack Edwards Bingo terms aside — and defers to Brickley’s analysis rather often.

    The thing is, too, is that this isn’t really any sort of new phenomenon. One of the most famous examples I’ve heard of this, and it used to be told by an old-school Habs fan I know with great verve, is likely apocryphal, but serves to illustrate the point of what being a homer broadcaster is all about pretty well:

    After his playing days, Maurice Richard became some sort of color guy for the Canadiens, and was in charge of picking the broadcast’s the three stars of the game. In one such instance, after a game against, say, the Blackhawks (I don’t remember and it doesn’t really matter), he said, “You know, for the first star tonight I want to pick Jean Beliveau. He had a goal and an assist in this game and really helped out Les Habitants with his performance. For the second star, I will pick my brother Henri Richard, because he had a goal as well. For for the third star, I will pick Stan Mikita from the Blackhawks because without his hat trick Chicago wouldn’t have won 3-2.”

    That’s what homer announcers are and what they’re supposed to do. The only reason you should get mad at them is if they even suck at that. And a lot of them do, so be mad all you want.

    Don’t forget to donate to 826 Boston. Thanks again.


    Counterpoint: Fighting is very conducive to winning

    February 28th, 2013

    (Ed. note: This is a sponsored post for @thebuck9. If you want me to write about any old thing in hockey, all you have to do is donate $50 below. It’s easy and fun. Bye.)

    Hi! I’m writing these posts to benefit 826 Boston, a nonprofit writing and tutoring center for area kids at which I volunteer. If you want to make a donation, you can click right here. Thanks!

    As you all likely well know about me, I am very open to the opinions of others, even if they challenge my own, and so when the guy whose Twitter name is listed above said I should write this sponsored post about how the Leafs wouldn’t be in a playoff hunt if not for the work of Colton Orr, that gave me a lot of pause.

    After all, if Randy Carlyle is playing the guy as many minutes as he has been in recent weeks, and the Leafs keep winning (if you ignore last night, which was clearly an outlier in expected results) doesn’t that tell you everything you need to know about the value guys like Orr provide? Carlyle, and every other NHL coach who routinely puts fighters in the lineup, have been around the game a lot longer than me and likely know a thing or three about what motivates professional hockey players, and makes teams win. Randy Carlyle has 555 NHL wins and one Stanley Cup more than I do, so it’s tough for me to sit in judgment.

    Let’s think about it another way, on a more macro level: Remember that game a few Saturdays back when Toronto went into the Bell Centre and stomped Montreal’s guts and teeth into a fine, unrecognizable paste? Sure you do. Do you also remember how did they do it? With tough guys in the lineup, that’s how.

    Here’s the box score. What do you see? Three fighting majors handed out, all of which the Leafs decidedly won thanks to the top-quality pugilistic efforts of Mark Fraser, Mike Kostka and Frasier McLaren. Colton Orr also played nearly five minutes that night, likely because the Habs were already so intimidated (as evidenced by Brendan Gallagher’s diving penalty early in the second period) that they didn’t need to put the big guns out there. Someone would have gotten killed.

    Or how about the example of a young man on the Phoenix Coyotes run by the name of Paul Bissonnette, otherwise known as BizNasty? His team is technically ninth in the Western Conference, but tied with eighth-place San Jose at 21 points. But they just beat the Vancouver Canucks, and Bissonnette is a big reason why. He has three points in his last three games, tripling his total in 31 last season and 48 the year before.

    In furtherance of this theory, I also took a look at HockeyFights.com to see the team leader board. The Leafs, a playoff team, have more fights than anyone else in the NHL. The Philadelphia Flyers, also a playoff team, are tied for second with 18. The Vancouver Canucks, also a playoff team, are fourth with 16. The Dallas Stars and Montreal Canadiens, playoff teams both, are tied for fifth with 12. The Los Angeles Kings, also a playoff team, are tied for eighth with 11.

    So that’s six of the league’s top 10 fighting teams in the playoffs. And here’s another fun fact for all you punk pacifists out there: When the Bruins won the Stanley Cup two seasons ago, they were also second in the league in fights. That tells you everything you need to know, and stands as evidence enough that there’s a strong correlation between playing so-called “thugs” and winning hockey games with regularity.

    Figure it out, and give Colton Orr 20 minutes a night.

    (*This post tagged under “Arguments an idiot would make.”)

    Don’t forget to donate to 826 Boston. Thanks again.


    Oh hey PK Subban is good

    February 21st, 2013

    (Ed. note: This is a sponsored post for Noha Beshir. If you want me to write about any old thing in hockey, all you have to do is donate $50 below. It’s easy and fun. Bye.)

    Hi! I’m writing these posts to benefit 826 Boston, a nonprofit writing and tutoring center for area kids at which I volunteer. If you want to make a donation, you can click right here. Thanks!

    It seems like about a million years ago that the Canadiens let their best defenseman sit out for a few weeks but man was that ever a dumb decision, huh?

    Boy, PK Subban is a good defenseman, and with him the Habs have pretty well taken off under new coach Michel Therrien, where before he rejoined the team they were merely “surprisingly good.” Don’t everybody all look at once, but the Canadiens are improbably atop the Northeast Division, ahead of even their biggest rivals in Boston, and tied for first in the conference, which doesn’t seem like it should be possible.

    And obviously it’s not just PK Subban who’s driving the Habs to these wins, but he’s second among defensemen on the team in relative corsi, though he has been used in a somewhat limited role, getting just under 20 minutes a night. But hey, it’s also difficult to argue with results. The Habs won seven of their first 11 games with Subban in the lineup this season, and that’s kind of a decent amount. Two of their losses also came in a shootout, although it was to Buffalo and most recently the Islanders, so that’s a little embarrassing.

    (An unsponsored aside: All this, by the way, goes without mentioning that Max Pacioretty has been mindbendingly amazing this season, and that’s apart from his superhuman ability to suffer horrific injuries. He has 13 points in as many games, but do you want to see some bonkers stuff? Behindthenet.ca has his relative corsi at 39.5, which is crazily high. He also has a PDO of less than 1000, and is one of the few Habs who do, indicating that where most of his teammates have been getting a lot of bounces, he hasn’t been. So the fact that he’s unlucky and playing this well is kind of a little bit impressive I guess. When his PDO corrects a little bit he can probably expect to get even more points going forward, which doesn’t seem fair, but here we are.)

    Certainly, no one expected them to be anywhere near this position, and even as they try to suck all the fun out of Subban’s game by banning all that “brash” stuff (CODEWORDS!!!) he used to do, he doesn’t seem to be be suffering any ill effects. If anything, maybe you’d like to see him pick up the scoring a bit, because he only has seven points, and the one he got last night was his first in four games. But still, he’s helping to make this excellent season from Carey Price possible, and that’s something.

    The question becomes one of whether the Habs can keep this going, and while the answer seems to be something like, “Probably not at this level,” they haven’t been so lucky percentages-wise that they’re going to drop off the face of the earth at some point like the Wild did last season. They’re closing in on being halfway to the 50ish points that will probably be required to get into the playoffs, which most of us probably expected would be a threshold they’d cross around late March, not mid-February.

    I don’t really get it, and I’m sure Habs fans don’t care, so I’m just going to say this is all because of Subban coming back. Screw it.

    Don’t forget to donate to 826 Boston. Thanks again.