Good night: An unenviable position

The Lead
It’s overtime. Game 2 at Detroit. Your team came back from down a goal more than halfway through the third.
You are Brian Campbell.
Some facts before we continue: You’re having your best game of the playoffs so far. Unequivocally. By any reasonable metric (except points, I guess), you are blowing away any of your prior 12 games in this postseason, playing on a level that most would not expect of you, because not only are you contributing on offense with an assist and five shots, which is expected of you, but you’re also — and this is the stunning part — carrying the water on defense. You, along with your D partner Brent Seabrook, lead the team in time on ice by a wide margin. You’re doling out hits (well, you have two, but that’s a lot for you), you’re blocking shots (three!) and you’re actually creating turnovers.
Perhaps, you dare yourself to think, people will start seeing you as more than a one-way defenseman, and one that, frankly, plays the wrong end of the rink. Perhaps those that scoff at your contract, which has been more or less hilariously unjustifiable to this point, will be proven wrong. Perhaps you’ll even help your team scrape out a 3-2 overtime win AT THE JOE.
And things are going just fine in overtime too. Detroit drew a penalty, but it was killed with some degree of efficiency (not by you, of course), so no worries. Oh look, here’s an offensive-zone possession.
Whoa! That bouncer was pretty dangerous for Chris Osgood there, but your buddy Patty Kane got it back. Oh look he’s passing to you! This is exciting. It’s fun to play the puck in OT.
Wuh oh here’s Mikael Samuelsson to bother you. No big deal though, he’s not known for…
Oh, you’ve fallen down. That’s not good. There goes the puck. And there goes Samuelsson with Jiri Hudler and Valtteri Filppula the other way. There’s a game-winner. It’s all your fault. Why did anyone ever believe in you?
You are, after all, only Brian Campbell.
May 20th, 2009 at 3:08 am
Ice cold.
(Also hilarious)
May 20th, 2009 at 8:48 am
(Campbell’s partner is Niklas Hjalmarsson, Seabrook plays with Keith)
May 20th, 2009 at 9:47 am
Now you’re just making names up.
May 20th, 2009 at 11:31 am
So he is. Whatever. They had a few shifts together I stick by my story >:( !!!!
May 20th, 2009 at 11:54 am
Also not pictured, that $6 million dollar/yr. goaltender they signed at the same time. I think their GM was smoking something that day.
May 20th, 2009 at 12:01 pm
STOP GIVING AWAY PUCKS AT THE BLUELINE YOU FUCKS
May 20th, 2009 at 12:21 pm
god damn that made me laugh. thanks!
May 25th, 2009 at 2:44 pm
Campbell is such painful temptation for hockey GMs. He’s been such a goat in so many playoffs, yet he looks so good in the regular season. Surely, all-seeing genius that I am, I can add that mysterious piece to this maligned player to turn him into The Total Package(tm).
But it never works, you never know why, and you always end up taking it up the rosebud; so Brian Campbell remains a mystery wrapped in an enema.
May 26th, 2009 at 5:03 pm
Look at the replay of the game 2 OT winner and focus on #88 (Kane). He was 1 foot behind Samuelsson at the Red Wing blue line, but amazingly he stopped skating and cruised through the nuetral zone as the three Wings are breaking out, so Samuelsson is left wide open in the slot for the winning goal. Kane’s not even in the picture frame as the winning goal is slapped in. He’s worst-in-playoffs -10 and is a total liability. Campbell lost his edge on the play, but Kane gave up like nothing I’ve ever seen before in a Stanley Cup semi-final OT.
May 27th, 2009 at 11:32 am
co-sign on Matt D’s comment. Kane gave up on the back check which is totally unacceptable.