Random Post: NHL releases 2008-09 schedule
RSS .92| RSS 2.0| ATOM 0.3
  • Home
  •  

    Darryl Sutter gets it, press still doesn’t

    Because the entire world can’t stop talking about Sean Avery’s “sloppy seconds” comment (I have friends who haven’t seen a hockey game in their lives texting me about it), the story goes on and on and on. But at least one guy in the hockey world is sick of it.

    Darryl Sutter was asked about it at a press conference and provided the most pointed criticism of anyone. Except Sutter directed it at the media.

    “You know what? Put it to bed. You guys cover hockey. It’s supposed to be the sports page. If you guys want to cover that stuff, go ahead. It’s been pretty disgusting for three days, actually. The Dallas Stars come to town . . . two of the best spokesmen in the league, other than a couple of our guys, are Mike Modano and Marty Turco, and I didn’t see their picture or hear a story about them.

    “So you guys aren’t really covering hockey.”

    Attaboy, Darryl. The whole thing is, and has been, silly from the get-go, and while Avery clearly planned this whole thing, the media certainly did its part to drum up interest ahead of the Dallas/Calgary game two nights ago. While it’s impossible to say if Avery would have made the comment had the media not been working so hard to talk to him about the “Jarome Iginla is boring” thing (and I’d say he probably would’ve because, hey, he’s Sean Avery), it certainly can’t have helped him to avoid the desire to turn the game into another sideshow act.

    Andre Roy, who called Avery a “dum-dum,” also had a suggestion for how the media should deal with Avery in the future:

    “But maybe you can stop talking (to Avery), even if he gets a hat trick. Just leave him in the corner and don’t even mention him. That would be the right thing to do with this guy because he definitely needs attention. That’s what he’s looking for.’”

    But then Scott Cruickshank, who’s usually a pretty damn good writer, went waaaaaaaaaaay off the reservation.

    Is his conduct as bad as drilling someone head-first into the boards? …Or is it worse?

    Actual question being posed: Is calling someone a name “as bad as” or “worse” than potentially putting someone’s life in jeopardy? Hmmm that IS a noodle-scratcher. I mean, on the one hand words HURT! On the other hand, so does a crushed vertebrae. Unfortunately, science has yet to quantify which injury is more severe and damaging in the long-term.

    Think of it this way. Todd Bertuzzi almost crippled someone for life and might end up serving fewer games than Sean Avery, who said a mean thing about an ex-girlfriend.

    Yeah, that makes tons of sense.

    6 Responses to “Darryl Sutter gets it, press still doesn’t”

    1. miles Says:

      right on… i just don’t get why he gets suspended or kicked off a team for his comments. C’mon boys, toughen up a bit!

    2. Stratego Says:

      Avery spent too much time watching pro wrestling growing up. He was just trying to be a good heel for the upcoming match. The NHL just can’t see the interest he is trying to inject in to the sport and the media takes everything too seriously to get it. The most important part of his comments were the last ones, “Enjoy the game tonight.”

      He’s still a diving kook, though.

    3. Duncan Kinney Says:

      I don’t understand what exactly Darryl gets that the press doesn’t. You take one sentence of a Cruickshank article out of context and all of a sudden everyone in the press is a moron for following what has been the biggest story in the NHL all year?

      I don’t follow.

    4. dr van nostrum Says:

      I think Sutter’s point is that the press goes looking for the lurid, instead of focusing on legitimate hockey talk. Kudos to Sutter for figuring it out.

      Cruikshank is a good guy. Sounds like he just got caught up in the hysteria.

    5. sba Says:

      Initially, I was hurt by his words.

    6. brandon Says:

      Ex girlfriends are nothing but drama

    Leave a Reply